Sleep assessment by patients and nurses in the intensive care: An exploratory descriptive study

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Accepted Manuscript (AM)

Author(s)
Aitken, Leanne M
Elliott, Rosalind
Mitchell, Marion
Davis, Chelsea
Macfarlane, Bonnie
Ullman, Amanda
Wetzig, Krista
Datt, Ashika
McKinley, Sharon
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2017
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract

Background: Sleep disruption is common in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, with reports indicating reduced quality and quantity of sleep in many patients. There is growing evidence that sleep in this setting may be improved. Aim: To describe ICU patients’ self-report assessment of sleep, examine the relationship between patients’ self-reported sleep and their reported sleep by the bedside nurse, and describe the strategies suggested by patients to promote sleep. Methods: An exploratory descriptive study was undertaken with communicative adult patients consecutively recruited in 2014–2015. Patients reported sleep using the Richards–Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (score range 0–100 mm; higher score indicates better sleep quality), with nursing assessment of sleep documented across a five level ordinal variable. Patients were asked daily to describe strategies that helped or hindered their sleep. Ethical approval for the study was gained. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed [median (interquartile range)]; relationships were tested using Spearman’s rank correlation and differences assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test; p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Participants (n = 151) were recruited [age: 60 (46–71) years; ICU length of stay 4 (2–9) days] with 356 self-reports of sleep. Median perceived sleep quality was 46 (26–65) mm. A moderate relationship existed between patients’ self-assessment and nurses’ assessment of sleep (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient 0.39–0.50; p < 0.001). Strategies identified by patients to improve sleep included adequate pain relief and sedative medication, a peaceful and comfortable environment and physical interventions, e.g. clustering care, ear plugs. Conclusion: Patients reported on their sleep a median of 2 (1–3) days during their ICU stay, suggesting that routine use of self-report was feasible. These reports revealed low sleep quality. Patients reported multiple facilitators and barriers for sleep, with environmental and patient comfort factors being most common. Interventions that target these factors to improve patient sleep should be implemented.

Journal Title

Australian Critical Care

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

30

Issue

2

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2016 Australian College of Critical Care Nurses Ltd. Published by Elsevier Australia. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, providing that the work is properly cited.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Clinical sciences

Nursing

Nursing not elsewhere classified

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections