Automated versus manual blood pressure measurement: A randomized crossover trial

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version
Author(s)
Heinemann, Megan
Sellick, Ken
Rickard, Claire
Reynolds, Pam
McGrail, Matthew
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2008
Size

143253 bytes

File type(s)

application/pdf

Location
License
Abstract

This study evaluated the accuracy and reliability of the Dinamap 8100 automated blood pressure machine against three internationally recognized criteria. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were taken concurrently by two nurses using the automated machine and a manual sphygmomanometer. Results demonstrated agreement between automated and manual readings on one set of criteria for both systolic and diastolic pressures, and support for systolic readings only on one other criterion. Comparison of mean differences between automated and manual measures showed the automated machine consistently under-read both systolic and diastolic blood pressures. The conclusion from this study was that the Dinamap 8100 machine can be used with some degree of confidence to assess systolic blood pressures in a general population of adult hospital inpatients, but with caution when taking diastolic readings.

Journal Title

International Journal of Nursing Practice

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

14

Issue

4

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2008 Wiley-Blackwell Publishing. This is the author-manuscript version of the paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. The definitive version is available at www.interscience.wiley.com

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Nursing

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections