Picking the low-hanging fruit: Why not choose oral antibiotics for skin and soft-tissue infections in the emergency department

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Hamill, Laura M
Thi, Yu-Chen E
Keijzers, Gerben
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2019
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Skin and soft‐tissue infections are a common presentation to EDs in Australasia. In the absence of sepsis or decreased oral absorption, substantial supportive data exists that shows oral antibiotics are non‐inferior to intravenous antibiotics for uncomplicated skin and soft‐tissue infections. However, despite a fair evidence base, clinicians are not consistently putting this into practice. This perspective reviews the relevant literature, discusses barriers to the implementation of this more parsimonious approach and also proposes several potential solutions. It is important that ED clinicians are encouraged to use oral antibiotics for uncomplicated infections, as this would lead to similar clinical outcomes but with fewer resources for staff and patient, as well as increased patient satisfaction.

Journal Title

Emergency Medicine Australasia

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

31

Issue

6

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Clinical sciences

antimicrobial stewardship

cellulitis

choosing wisely

oral antibiotics

skin and soft tissue infection

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Hamill, LM; Thi, Y-CE; Keijzers, G, Picking the low-hanging fruit: Why not choose oral antibiotics for skin and soft-tissue infections in the emergency department., Emergency Medicine Australasia, 2019, 31 (6), pp. 1-3

Collections