Police interventions with mentally disturbed individuals
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Roy, Leaw
Boivin, Remi
Leclerc, Benoit
Choiniere-Tran, Kim
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
This article applies script analysis to police interventions with an emotionally disturbed person (EDP) in order to identify factors associated with the use of force. Data were extracted from 130 police reports. The script was divided into five steps: (1) answering the call and dispatching police officers; (2) arriving on the scene; (3) assessing the EDP; (4) intervening with the EDP; and (5) managing the EDP. Results indicate that police use of force is more likely when a third party is in danger. Conversely, the presence of a person with a good relationship with the EPD is negatively associated with the use of force. Results also show that police use of force is the result of exchanges between the officer and the EPD. Coercive communication strategies often decrease collaboration and lack of collaboration is more likely to lead to the police use of force. Finally, findings suggest that a theory of the use of force should incorporate situational factors such as interactions between the police officer and the suspect.
Journal Title
Criminologie
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
52
Issue
2
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2019 University of Montreal Press. This is an electronic version of an article published in Criminologie, Volume 52, Number 2, Fall 2019, p. 321–348 , available online: https://doi.org/10.7202/1065866ar
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Criminology
Social Sciences
Criminology & Penology
Use of force
emotionally disturbed individuals
police
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Blais, E; Roy, L; Boivin, R; Leclerc, B; Choiniere-Tran, K, Police interventions with mentally disturbed individuals, Criminologie, 2019, 52 (2), pp. 321-348