Masking ability of additively manufactured definitive crown materials
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Plaksina, Polina
Du, Karen
Muao, Teuila
Cameron, Andrew B
Choi, Joanne Jung Eun
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract
Objective Additively manufactured (3D-printed) definitive crown materials are continuously gaining popularity in prosthodontic rehabilitation as an alternative to subtractive manufacturing (milling). Current scientific literature on the optical properties and masking ability of these materials is scarcely available. This study aimed to measure colour change and translucency parameters of additively manufactured permanent crown materials to investigate their masking ability with varying printing parameters. Methods 60 specimens were milled; 120 specimens were additively manufactured (3D printed) at 0° and 45° with DLP printer and SLA printer each. Specimens were post-processed according to the manufacturer's instructions and cemented onto three different shades of substrates, simulating natural (ND3), discoloured (ND8), and severely discoloured (ND9) dentine. Values L, a, and b were measured with spectrophotometer Vita EasyShade V and used to calculate the colour difference (ΔE) and translucency parameter (ΔTP) using the CIELAB formula. Collected data was statistically analysed with two-way ANOVA and post-hoc analysis was performed. Results ΔE and ΔTP were significantly lower in 2 mm milled and additively manufactured specimens. The lowest mean ΔE was observed in DLP 2 mm 0° group against ND3 (0.76 ± 0.12) and the lowest mean observed in DLP 2 mm 0° group against ND9 (1.06 ± 0.26). All 2 mm specimens were considered acceptable matches, with mean values > PT and ≤AT in DE (1.2 > ΔE ≤ 2.7). and ΔTP (1.33 > ΔTP ≤4.43). All 1 mm specimens were unacceptable matches (>AT × 3) for masking ND9. Conclusion The masking ability of additively manufactured crown materials is influenced by different printing factors. Between 3D printer types, SLA-printed specimens showed better masking ability and higher translucency parameters compared to DLP-printed specimens. SLA-printed at 2 mm and 0° angle, demonstrated sufficient masking for ND3 and ND8 substrates, while milled materials were superior in masking the darkest substrate (ND9).
Journal Title
Digital Dentistry Journal
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
3
Issue
1
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Hung, ST-H; Plaksina, P; Du, K; Muao, T; Cameron, AB; Choi, JJE, Masking ability of additively manufactured definitive crown materials, Digital Dentistry Journal, 2025, 3 (1), pp. 100050