Order of instruction effects – do they make a difference when teaching senior chemistry with computer based visualizations?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version
Author(s)
Mukherjee, Michelle M.
Fogarty, Ian
Geelan, David R.
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)

Theo Bastiaens & Martin Ebner

Date
2011
Size

145575 bytes

File type(s)

application/pdf

Location

Lisbon, Portugal

License
Abstract

This study investigated whether conceptual development is greater if students learning senior chemistry hear teacher explanations and other traditional teaching approaches first then see computer based visualizations or vice versa. Five Canadian chemistry classes, taught by three different teachers, studied the topics of Le Chatelier's Principle and dynamic chemical equilibria using scientific visualizations with the explanation and visualizations in different orders. Conceptual development was measured using a 12 item test based on the Chemistry Concepts Inventory. Data was obtained about the students' abilities, learning styles (auditory, visual or kinesthetic) and sex, and the relationships between these factors and conceptual development due to the teaching sequences were investigated. It was found that teaching sequence is not important in terms of students' conceptual learning gains, across the whole cohort or for any of the three subgroups.

Journal Title
Conference Title

Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (EDMEDIA) 2011

Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2011 AACE and the Education & Information Technology Digital Library (EdITLib). The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the conference's website for access to the definitive, published version.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Science, Technology and Engineering Curriculum and Pedagogy

Persistent link to this record
Citation