Response to: ‘Cannabis use before safety sensitive work: What delay is prudent?’
File version
Accepted Manuscript (AM)
Author(s)
Arkell, Thomas R
Irwin, Christopher
McGregor, Iain S
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract
We read with interest the commentary by Beckson et al., 2020 on our recent publication, entitled: ‘Determining the magnitude and duration of acute Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC)-induced driving and cognitive impairment: A systematic and meta-analytic review’ (McCartney et al., 2021).
Journal Title
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
137
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2022 Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, providing that the work is properly cited.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Cognitive and computational psychology
Behavioural neuroscience
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Behavioral Sciences
Neurosciences
Neurosciences & Neurology
Persistent link to this record
Citation
McCartney, D; Arkell, TR; Irwin, C; McGregor, IS, Response to: ‘Cannabis use before safety sensitive work: What delay is prudent?’, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2022, 137, pp. 104684