Exploring attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination in adults with haematological malignancies

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Blennerhassett, Richard
Hamad, Nada
Grech, Lisa
Forsyth, Cecily
Jagger, Jacqueline
Opat, Stephen
Harris, Samuel
Chan, Bryan
Kwok, Alastair
Nguyen, Mike
Bain, Nathan
Day, Daphne
Segelov, Eva
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2022
Size
File type(s)
Location

Brisbane, Australia

License
Abstract

Aims: People with haematological malignancies (HM) are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 infection and death due to underlying immune deficiency and impaired vaccine responses. From March 2021, COVID-19 vaccination was offered to patients with HM, as part of the Australian COVID-19 vaccination rollout program. This study sought to ascertain whether vaccine hesitancy was a barrier to optimal vaccine uptake and explored the attitudes of people with HM towards COVID-19 vaccination.

Methods: Between June and October 2021, an online survey was distributed to adults with HM at nine Australian health services. The survey collected sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and attitudes towards COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination using the Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Scale, the Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence and Complacency Scale, and the Disease Influenced Vaccine Acceptance Scale-Six (DIVAS-6).

Results: Of the 869 survey participants (mean age 64.2 years, 43.6% female), 741 (85.3%) reported receiving at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose. Unvaccinated status was significantly associated with younger age, English as a non-dominant language, and shorter duration since diagnosis. Participants who were female or spoke English as their non-dominant language reported more negative attitudes towards vaccine side-effects. Unvaccinated participants were more likely to report greater concerns about the vaccine impacting on their HM and treatment (DIVAS-6 Vaccine Vulnerability subscale score: B (SE) = 2.71 (0.35), p < 0.001). They were also more likely to report greater vaccine complacency (DIVAS-6 Disease Complacency subscale score: B (SE) = 1.79 (0.28), p < 0.001).

Conclusions: People with HM reported high vaccine uptake, however, participants who are recently diagnosed with malignancy, female, younger age or for whom English is a non-dominant language may benefit from targeted education strategies to address their vaccine concerns. Clinicians are well-positioned to address their patients’ specific vaccine concerns and support the decision-making process, particularly with the need for COVID-19 vaccine boosters.

Journal Title
Conference Title

Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology

Book Title
Edition
Volume

18

Issue

S3

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Oncology and carcinogenesis

Science & Technology

Life Sciences & Biomedicine

Oncology

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Blennerhassett, R; Hamad, N; Grech, L; Forsyth, C; Jagger, J; Opat, S; Harris, S; Chan, B; Kwok, A; Nguyen, M; Bain, N; Day, D; Segelov, E, Exploring attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination in adults with haematological malignancies, Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2022, 18 (S3), pp. 208-209