Assessment of clinical reproducibility for intraoral scanning on different anatomical regions for the complete maxillary edentulous arch with two intraoral scanners
File version
Accepted Manuscript (AM)
Author(s)
Abuzar, Menaka A
Tadakamadla, Santosh Kumar
Evans, Jane L
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract
Objectives There are no in vivo studies comparing multiple intraoral scanners for the completely edentulous maxilla to PVS impressions. Investigations comparing intraoral scanners to polyvinyl siloxane impressions focus on comparing the overall scan and not individual anatomical regions. This study aims to evaluate two intraoral scanners and compare the results for different anatomical regions on the completely edentulous maxillary arch.
Materials and methods Nineteen patients were recruited with a completely edentulous maxilla. A custom tray was constructed, and a sectional border moulded polyvinyl siloxane impression was made then scanned. An intraoral scan of the edentulous maxilla with a Trios 4 (3Shape, B/V) and Medit i700 (Medit corporation) was then captured. The scans were analysed for negative and positive surface deviations along with root mean square for distinct anatomical regions compared to the polyvinyl siloxane impression. A two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD post hoc tests for each scanner was conducted for all anatomical regions to determine differences between the regions.
Results There was no significant difference between the two intraoral scanners included in this study for all anatomical regions or for the overall scan (0.435, 0.38), palatal vault (0.18, 0.181), ridge (0.218, 0.209), and post dam (0.233, 0.229) anatomical regions. Significantly higher deviation (p<0.05) was observed for the peripheral regions (0.607, 0.557) for each intraoral scanners Trio 4 and Medit i700.
Conclusion Different intraoral scanners can capture all areas of a completely edentulous maxilla consistently, when compared to a polyvinyl siloxane impression, apart from the peripheries.
Clinical significance Care should be taken when scanning the peripheries. These regions are problematic to capture with an intraoral scanner. Border moulding should still be considered the optimal impression technique for the completely edentulous maxilla. The intraoral scanners investigated did not make a difference for the anatomical regions investigated.
Journal Title
Journal of Dentistry
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Item Access Status
Note
This publication has been entered in Griffith Research Online as an advance online version.
Copyright permissions for this publication were identified from the publisher's website at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105485
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Biomedical imaging
Dentistry
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Cameron, AB; Abuzar, MA; Tadakamadla, SK; Evans, JL, Assessment of clinical reproducibility for intraoral scanning on different anatomical regions for the complete maxillary edentulous arch with two intraoral scanners, Journal of Dentistry, 2024, pp. 105485