Composite Testing—How Accurate Are Design Estimates?
File version
Author(s)
Javanbakht, Z
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Hall, Wayne
Javanbakht, Zia
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
A selection of simple composite design (mechanics) equations were introduced in Chap. 2 to enable prediction of the mechanical properties of fibre-reinforced composites (FRCs). The rule of mixtures (RoM) and inverse rule of mixtures (IRoM) expressions were introduced for elastic moduli estimation, whilst longitudinal strength was considered via the Kelly-Tyson (KT) model. Chapters 3 and 4 then introduced wet layup, and vacuum bagging and prepreg moulding methods for composite manufacture. A carbon fibre-reinforced panels was fabricated using similar constituents (i.e. carbon fibres in an epoxy matrix) for each fabrication method. This chapter builds on these earlier chapters via a comparison of design (mechanical property) estimates and experimental data. Tensile tests are performed on multiple specimens cut from each of the panels. This chapter provides guidance on the accuracy of design estimates and offers support for the typical (rule of thumb) volume fractions suggested in Chaps. 3 and 4 for each manufacturing approach.
Journal Title
Conference Title
Book Title
Design and Manufacture of Fibre-Reinforced Composites
Edition
Volume
158
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Nanomaterials
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Hall, W; Javanbakht, Z, Composite Testing—How Accurate Are Design Estimates?, Design and Manufacture of Fibre-Reinforced Composites, 2021, 158, pp. 69-80