Multilevel governance of coastal flood risk reduction: A public finance perspective

Thumbnail Image
File version

Accepted Manuscript (AM)

Bisaro, A
de Bel, M
Hinkel, J
Kok, S
Stojanovic, T
Ware, D
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
File type(s)

Coastal flood risk reduction (CFRR) presents a significant public funding challenge, due to its high upfront costs and long-term benefits, and this challenge will increase with future sea-level rise. The funding challenge necessarily involves multiple levels of government, due to the regional nature of CFRR public goods involved. Yet there has been little research comparing such multilevel arrangements across countries, and in particular exploring the performance of public funding arrangements for providing coastal flood risk reduction. We address this gap, applying fiscal federalism to develop a multilevel governance analysis of public decision-making and fiscal authorities for CFRR in the Netherlands, Germany, the UK and Australia. For each country, we locate key decision-making and fiscal authorities in multilevel governance arrangements, and analyse their alignment with the benefits of CFRR measures (spillovers). We find diverse coastal flood risk governance arrangements ranging from highly centralised (NL), mixed arrangements, involving regional centralisation (Germany) or partial devolvement (UK), to full decentralisation (AUS). Further, we find that in accordance with fiscal federalism, multilevel coastal flood risk governance arrangements are generally reflective of the distribution of the benefits across different levels of government, with some exceptions (Germany and UK). Finally, exploring the outlook of current arrangements under sea-level rise, we find that major fiscal redistributions may be put under pressure by rising costs likely under SLR and future coastal development. This is particularly the case for those systems which operate under hazard-based, as opposed to risk-based, coastal protection policies. Further, we find that both fully and moderately decentralised arrangements may require greater central support for alternative measures, such as retreat, in light of growing financial burdens on local governments.

Journal Title

Environmental Science and Policy

Conference Title
Book Title


Thesis Type
Degree Program
Publisher link
Patent number
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license

Item Access Status
Access the data
Related item(s)
Persistent link to this record

Bisaro, A; de Bel, M; Hinkel, J; Kok, S; Stojanovic, T; Ware, D, Multilevel governance of coastal flood risk reduction: A public finance perspective, Environmental Science and Policy, 2020, 112, pp. 203-212