Inaccuracies in caffeine intake quantification and other important limitations in recent publication by Goncalves et al. (Letter)

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Areta, JL
Irwin, C
Desbrow, B
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2017
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

It was with great interest that we read the recent article by Gonçalves et al. (2). Given the Journal of Applied Physiology’s reputation for quality and the forthright title, we anticipated a significant advance in our understanding. Indeed, the study displays high standards of research and the authors should be acknowledged for the amount and quality of the work leading to this publication. However, we feel there may be limitations regarding the conclusions that can be drawn from this investigation.

Journal Title

Journal of Applied Psychology

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

123

Issue

5

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Nutrition and dietetics

Nutrition and dietetics not elsewhere classified

Biological sciences

Biomedical and clinical sciences

Health sciences

Science & Technology

Life Sciences & Biomedicine

Physiology

Sport Sciences

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Areta, JL; Irwin, C; Desbrow, B, Inaccuracies in caffeine intake quantification and other important limitations in recent publication by Goncalves et al., Journal of Applied Psychology, 2017, 123 (5), pp. 1414-1414

Collections