The perception and understanding of the terminology used to describe malnutrition from the perspective of patients and health workers: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
File version
Accepted Manuscript (AM)
Author(s)
Rushton, Alita
Bell, Jack
Young, Adrienne
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract
Background Malnutrition is prevalent across healthcare settings and has adverse outcomes for patients and the health system. However, some patients do not recall being informed about their malnutrition risk/diagnosis.
Objective This meta-synthesis of qualitative studies aimed to identify and synthesise patient, carer and health worker perceptions and understanding of the terminology used by health workers for malnutrition risk/malnutrition.
Methods Four databases were searched (Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Embase) up until August 2023. Title, abstract and full text screening were independently completed by 2 reviewers. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Studies Checklist. Data were analysed by the review team using thematic synthesis. The resulting themes informed review findings. The confidence in each finding was assessed using GRADE-CERQual.
Results Seventeen studies were included contributing perspectives from patients (n=7 studies), health workers (n=5 studies) or both patients and health workers (n=5 studies); no studies included carer perspectives. There were 5 themes: “Patients have differing understanding, interpretation of, and identification with malnutrition risk and malnutrition terminology” (very low confidence); “Health workers perceive that patients do not identify with or understand malnutrition risk and malnutrition terminology” (low confidence); “Patients do not routinely perceive their malnutrition risk or malnutrition diagnosis as problematic” (low confidence); “Health workers use varied terminology for malnutrition risk and malnutrition” (low confidence); “Action is required to improve malnutrition diagnostic communication” (low confidence).
Conclusions Findings highlighted disparity in patients’ perspectives regarding the terms used for malnutrition risk and malnutrition. Varied terms were used by health workers and patients did not often associate these terms with a health condition that required treatment. Health workers and patients called for action to improve the communication of malnutrition. To do this, further research exploring malnutrition terminology and the broader concept of malnutrition communication is required with patients, carers and health workers.
Journal Title
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2024 by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Item Access Status
Note
This publication has been entered in Griffith Research Online as an advance online version.
Copyright permissions for this publication were identified from the publisher's website at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2024.10.024
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Health sciences
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Mackay, S; Rushton, A; Bell, J; Young, A, The perception and understanding of the terminology used to describe malnutrition from the perspective of patients and health workers: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2024