Attributional patterns towards students with and without learning disabilities: A comparison of pre- and in-service teachers in China
File version
Author(s)
Woodcock, Stuart
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the differences of attributional responses to students with and without learning disabilities (LD) between pre- and in-service teachers in mainland China. A total of 204 teachers (101 pre-service and 103 in-service teachers) were surveyed using vignettes and Likert scale questions to ascertain their responses to students with and without LD. Drawing from Weiner’s attributional theory, teachers’ feedback, frustration, sympathy and expectation were measured. A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was executed to compare pre-service and in-service teacher responses regarding students with and without LD. The findings showed that pre-service teachers experienced significantly lower frustration than in-service teachers to students with and without LD. Moreover, the teachers gave more positive feedback but felt less sympathy to students with LD who exerted high effort. These findings implied that pre-service tended to foster a more positive attribution style. Implications and recommendations for research and practice are also presented.
Journal Title
Educational Psychology
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
38
Issue
3
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Specialist studies in education
Cognitive and computational psychology
Social Sciences
Education & Educational Research
Psychology, Educational
Psychology
Attribution
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Jiang, H; Woodcock, S, Attributional patterns towards students with and without learning disabilities: A comparison of pre- and in-service teachers in China, Educational Psychology, 2018, 38 (3), pp. 286-304