A short note on the chisholm paradox
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
Madrid, Spain
Abstract
We advance an alternative version of the Chisholm Paradox and we argue that the alternative version (while logically equivalent to the original version), in its manifestation in the natural language, is not intuitively consistent. The alternative version of the paradox suggests some requirements for deontic logics designed for legal reasoning.
Journal Title
Conference Title
CEUR Workshop Proceedings
Book Title
Edition
Volume
2632
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2020 for this paper by its author. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Theory of computation
Information systems
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Governatori, G, A short note on the chisholm paradox, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2020, 2632