Policy Brief – Improving water management in rural communities – Key findings for Policy in Fiji

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Version of Record (VoR)

Author(s)
Souter, Regina
Love, Mark
Pene, Sarah
Shrestha, Sachita
Beal, Cara
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2022
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Government and private sector water services to rural populations in PICs are limited and likely to remain so. Consequently, community water management (CWM) will remain the dominant model for rural water service delivery into the future, as reflected in many Pacific government WASH policies. However, evidence from the Pacific and elsewhere indicated that basic models of CWM, in which communities bear full responsibility to manage water systems after their installation, typically have low sustainability (Clarke et.al., 2014; Bond et.al., 2014; Hutchings et al., 2015; World Bank, 2017). This leads to poor WASH outcomes, such as inadequate accessibility, quality, and reliability of water and compromised hygiene practices.

Journal Title
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2022 International WaterCentre, Griffith University and the Author(s). The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the publisher’s website for further information.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Human impacts of climate change and human adaptation

Natural resource management

Rural community development

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Souter, R; Love, M; Pene, S; Shrestha, S; Beal, C, Policy Brief – Improving water management in rural communities – Key findings for Policy in Fiji, 2022

Collections