Autonomy versus futility? Barriers to good clinical practice in end-of-life care: a Queensland case

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Version of Record (VoR)

Author(s)
Lawrence, Sean
Willmott, Lindy
Milligan, Eleanor
Winch, Sarah
White, Ben
Parker, Malcolm
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2012
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Findings from a Queensland coronial inquest highlight the complex clinical, ethical and legal issues that arise in end-of-life care when clinicians and family members disagree about a diagnosis of clinical futility. The tension between the law and best medical practice is highlighted in this case, as doctors are compelled to seek family consent to not commence a futile intervention. Good communication between doctors and families, as well as community and professional education, is essential to resolve tensions that can arise when there is disagreement about treatment at the end of life.

Journal Title

Medical Journal of Australia

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

196

Issue

6

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

Lawrence S, Willmott L, Milligan E, et al. Autonomy versus futility? Barriers to good clinical practice in end-of-life care: a Queensland case. Med J Aust 2012; 196 (6): 404-405. © Copyright 2012 The Medical Journal of Australia – reproduced with permission.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Biomedical and clinical sciences

Psychology

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections