Presidents, Prime Ministers and Policy Rhetoric: The 'Credibility Gaps' of Woodrow Wilson and Kevin Rudd in the League of Nations and Climate Change Debates

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Widmaier, Wesley
Grube, Dennis
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2015
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

US President Woodrow Wilson and Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd were separated by institutional contexts, relative power positions and decades in time. However, each confronted a similar dilemma - of reconciling rhetorical idealism with policy practicalities. Building on insights from studies of the US rhetorical presidency, we offer a framework highlighting the tensions between 'outside' moral appeals which raise expectations and the 'inside' technocratic rhetoric of policy administration. We argue that norms encouraging moral appeals have come to transcend institutional differences between 'presidential' and 'prime ministerial' systems. Despite the different contexts of the Wilson-era League of Nations debate and the Rudd-era carbon tax-Kyoto controversies, we argue that pressures to 'speak in two voices' engendered credibility gaps that undermined each leader's congressional and parliamentary support. In concluding, we suggest that this analysis supports a more nuanced appreciation of the rhetorical imperatives that can impede policy efficiency - and the need to limit tendencies to either populist or intellectual partisanship.

Journal Title

Political Studies

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Political science

Political science not elsewhere classified

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections