Response to Natural childbirth ideology is endangering women and babies/Every CS must count (Letter)
File version
Author(s)
Oats, Jeremy
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
We thank the author for highlighting the important issue of maternal mortality related to mode of birth and in particular the increased risk of mortality associated with caesarean section (CS). We agree that the balance of evidence is that there is a measurably higher risk of mortality associated with CS, but we chose not to focus on this for several reasons. First, it is an extremely rare adverse outcome. Second, it is the individual's own risk that is most important in counselling and gaining informed consent. The population‐based data are informative but not especially useful for a woman who is very low‐risk for surgical or anaesthetic complications, but has a strong obstetric indication for CS. However, we entirely agree that when significant numbers of women are choosing CS for no obstetric indication these increased risks of mortality must be discussed and included in the consent process.
Journal Title
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
57
Issue
3
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
NHMRC
Grant identifier(s)
GNT1081026
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Reproductive medicine
Midwifery
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Ellwood, D; Oats, J, Response to Natural childbirth ideology is endangering women and babies/Every CS must count, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2017, 57 (3), pp. E5-E5