Response to Natural childbirth ideology is endangering women and babies/Every CS must count (Letter)

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Ellwood, David
Oats, Jeremy
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2017
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

We thank the author for highlighting the important issue of maternal mortality related to mode of birth and in particular the increased risk of mortality associated with caesarean section (CS). We agree that the balance of evidence is that there is a measurably higher risk of mortality associated with CS, but we chose not to focus on this for several reasons. First, it is an extremely rare adverse outcome. Second, it is the individual's own risk that is most important in counselling and gaining informed consent. The population‐based data are informative but not especially useful for a woman who is very low‐risk for surgical or anaesthetic complications, but has a strong obstetric indication for CS. However, we entirely agree that when significant numbers of women are choosing CS for no obstetric indication these increased risks of mortality must be discussed and included in the consent process.

Journal Title

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

57

Issue

3

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)

NHMRC

Grant identifier(s)

GNT1081026

Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Reproductive medicine

Midwifery

Science & Technology

Life Sciences & Biomedicine

Obstetrics & Gynecology

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Ellwood, D; Oats, J, Response to Natural childbirth ideology is endangering women and babies/Every CS must count, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2017, 57 (3), pp. E5-E5

Collections