Protein energy intake of critically injured patients throughout their recovery trajectory

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Marshall, Andrea P
Roberts, Shelley
Rattray, Megan
Lauer, Suzy
Wong, Julie
Pearson, David
Kydd, Jacquie
Fyffe, Sharnie
Wake, Elizabeth
Wullschlegger, Martin
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2020
Size
File type(s)
Location

Melbourne, Australia

License
Abstract

Introduction: Traumatic injury accounts for 7% of hospital admissions and places a substantial economic burden on healthcare systems. Longer stays in ICU and hospital contribute to suboptimal nutrition intake and development of iatrogenic complications, and poorer physical recovery. Little is known about the nutrition intakes of patients with critical injury throughout the trajectory of their hospital stay.

Objectives/Aims: To describe protein and energy adequacy among critically injured patients and identify factors that influence intakes in this at-risk group.

Methods: A prospective, single-centre, observational study was conducted using a concurrent mixed methods approach. Quantitative data included protein and energy intakes of patients; qualitative data were collected to identify factors influencing nutrition adequacy. This study was conducted in a metropolitan, tertiary teaching hospital, in southeast Queensland, where approximately 180 patients are admitted with a critical injury each year. Patients were eligible if they were ≥18 years of age and admitted with critical injury requiring ICU admission.

Results: Seventy-nine patients were enrolled; 8 did not transition to an acute care ward because of death or discharge to another facility. Forty-seven (59%) had an Injury Severity Score >15; half required mechanical ventilation. In ICU enteral or oral nutrition was delivered to 22 (28%) and 34 (43%) of patients, respectively. Twenty-three (29%) patients did not receive any nutrition while in ICU. Median energy and protein delivered from EN per day was 5302kJ (IQR 2450-7653) and 50.1g (IQR 24.1-77.6) of protein. After ICU discharge the percentage of energy (%EER) and protein requirements (%EPR) met were low; at day 7 %EER was 52.6% and %EPR was 64.8%. Functional ability and perceptions of nutrition contributed to poor intake after ICU discharge.

Conclusion: Strategies to optimize nutrition intake throughout the critical injury recovery trajectory are important to enhance nutrition intake and support recovery from critical injury.

Journal Title
Conference Title

Australian Critical Care

Book Title
Edition
Volume

33

Issue

Supplement 1

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Clinical sciences

Nursing

Science & Technology

Life Sciences & Biomedicine

Critical Care Medicine

General & Internal Medicine

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Marshall, AP; Roberts, S; Rattray, M; Lauer, S; Wong, J; Pearson, D; Kydd, J; Fyffe, S; Wake, E; Wullschlegger, M, Protein energy intake of critically injured patients throughout their recovery trajectory, Australian Critical Care, 2020, 33 (Supplement 1), pp. S6-S6