Surgical mortality audit data validity

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Rey-Conde, Therese
Shakya, Riyaz
Allen, Jennifer
Clarke, Evelyn
North, John B
Wysocki, Arkadiusz Peter
Ware, Robert S
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2016
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Background: Surgical audits provide constructive feedback to individual surgeons, hospitals and other healthcare sector professionals. Audits identify deficiencies in treatment processes, evaluate practice trends and detect practice gaps. The credibility and validity of the Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality (QASM) relies on the accuracy of its data. Methods: To determine the validity of routine reporting of surgical information to QASM, surgical case forms were compared against medical records (considered the gold standard). Data were extracted by a trained medical research assistant. QASM forensically reviewed 896 of a total of 5636 deaths in 20 Queensland public hospitals between 2008 and 2013. Concordance between the surgical case form and the relevant medical record was determined for 27 objective items. Results: Overall concordance was 98.2%. The median concordance was 100% (interquartile range 87–100%). Cases with discordance were few and in these, most had only one discordant item. Discordances were mainly omissions. Conclusion: The QASM surgical case form is a reliable data collection tool that provides high-quality data. QASM objective data can be confidently regarded as accurate and therefore reliable for use in publications, reports and case studies.

Journal Title

ANZ Journal of Surgery

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

86

Issue

9

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Clinical sciences

Clinical sciences not elsewhere classified

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections