Does Enhanced Primary Care enhance primary care? Policy-induced dilemmas for allied health professionals

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Version of Record (VoR)

Author(s)
Foster, Michele
Mitchell, Geoffrey
Haines, Terry
Tweedy, Sean
Cornwell, Petrea
Fleming, Jennifer
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2008
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

*One aim of Medicare's Enhanced Primary Care (EPC) initiative is to encourage multidisciplinary care of patients with chronic disease by funding five allied health treatment sessions per patient per year. * In many cases, the number of funded treatments is far less than standard clinical practice indicates, particularly when the five visits are shared between service providers. * We believe clinical outcomes may be compromised by adhering to the funded hours, and inequity of outcome may arise based on socioeconomic status and the ability of patients to pay. *Research that determines how patients and allied health practitioners are responding to this initiative is required. *Research is also required to evaluate whether EPC enhances clinical outcomes compared with no allied health intervention and standard allied health practice.

Journal Title

Medical Journal of Australia

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

188

Issue

1

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

Foster MM, Mitchell G, Haines T, et al. Does Enhanced Primary Care enhance primary care? Policy-induced dilemmas for allied health professionals. Med J Aust 2008; 188 (1): 29-32. © Copyright 2008 The Medical Journal of Australia – reproduced with permission.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Biomedical and clinical sciences

Psychology

Health sciences

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections