Legal Representation and Reasoning in Practice: A Critical Comparison

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Version of Record (VoR)

Author(s)
Batsakis, Sotiris
Baryannis, George
Governatori, Guido
Tachmazidis, Ilias
Antoniou, Grigoris
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)

Palmirani, M

Date
2018
Size
File type(s)
Location

Univ Groningen, Fac Sci & Engn, Bernoulli Inst Math, Comp Sci & Artificial, Groningen, NETHERLANDS

Abstract

Representation and reasoning over legal rules is an important application domain and a number of related approaches have been developed. In this work, we investigate legal reasoning in practice based on three use cases of increasing complexity. We consider three representation and reasoning approaches: (a) Answer Set Programming, (b) Argumentation and (c) Defeasible Logic. Representation and reasoning approaches are evaluated with respect to semantics, expressiveness, efficiency, complexity and support.

Journal Title
Conference Title

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Book Title
Edition
Volume

313

Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2018 The authors and IOS Press. This article is published online with Open Access by IOS Press and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Theory of computation

Science & Technology

Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence

Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Computer Science

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Batsakis, S; Baryannis, G; Governatori, G; Tachmazidis, I; Antoniou, G, Legal Representation and Reasoning in Practice: A Critical Comparison, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 2018, 313, pp. 31-40