Response to letter to the editor: When does selection generate bias in clinical samples?

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Saiepour, Nargess
Najman, Jackob M
Ware, Robert S
Baker, Peter
Clavarino, Alexandra
Williams, Gail M
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2019
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

We welcome the opportunity to respond to the letter by Höfler and Trautmann (2019) entitled “When does selection generate bias in clinical samples?” Höfler and Trautmann argue there are limitations of our study which compromise the validity of our findings. There are three main concerns raised by Höfler and Trautmann. First that our findings conflict with a well-established body of theory which emphasises the broad problem of selection bias and its impact on research findings. Second, that our findings are population based and may have little relevance to “clinical’ samples. Third, our findings may not be generalizable to many studies.

Journal Title

Journal of Psychiatric Research

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

116

Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Biomedical and clinical sciences

Psychology

Science & Technology

Life Sciences & Biomedicine

Psychiatry

FOLLOW-UP

NONRESPONSE BIAS

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Saiepour, N; Najman, JM; Ware, RS; Baker, P; Clavarino, A; Williams, GM, Response to letter to the editor: When does selection generate bias in clinical samples?, Journal of Psychiatric Research, 2019, 116, pp. 191-192

Collections