Common reasons why an academic paper is rejected: views from the editors

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Molassiotis, A
McCarthy, A
Charalambous, A
Gibson, F
Lopez, V
Beaver, K
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2019
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

The editors of this journal meet many researchers at conferences and workshops who have tried and failed to publish the results of their studies. Having experienced these ourselves as authors, we do understand the frustration that potential authors often express. For those new to the publishing world, the disappointment of rejection runs deep, and often, despite very helpful reviews, that paper might never be resurrected again. The reality is that when a paper is rejected the reviewers or editors have detected significant problems with that paper that preclude its potential usefulness to our audience. In this editorial, we provide an overview of the primary reasons for rejection from the European Journal of Oncology Nursing (EJON), in the hope that authors will understand our reasoning and to help them avoid rejection in the future.

Journal Title

European Journal of Oncology Nursing

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

40

Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Nursing

Oncology and carcinogenesis

Health services and systems

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Molassiotis, A; McCarthy, A; Charalambous, A; Gibson, F; Lopez, V; Beaver, K, Common reasons why an academic paper is rejected: views from the editors, European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 2019, 40, pp. v-vi

Collections