What does the new Australian Foreign Policy White Paper mean for MIKTA?
File version
Author(s)
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Siswo Pramono, et al
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
Australia has been a key proponent of 'active middle power' diplomacy for many decades, often in concert with Canada, New Zealand and South Korea. Australia now often terms itself a 'pivotal power' or 'top 20' power. 1 Australia has often claimed that it wishes to fulfil the roles of 'great power manager', such as dealing with close ally the US to soften its positions, 'emerging power advocate' in advocating trade ally China to join the liberal order, or issue-based 'coalition-builder'.2 Australia has been an active member and proponent of the MIKTA grouping in this context, and invested in a successful chairing year for MIKTA in 2016. Australia sees MIKTA as a governance innovation that could lead to other kinds of innovative thinking and provide new regional perspectives on global problems.
Journal Title
Conference Title
Book Title
MIKTA: Current Situation and The Way Forward
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Law and Legal Studies not elsewhere classified
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Harris Rimmer, S, What does the new Australian Foreign Policy White Paper mean for MIKTA?, MIKTA: Current Situation and The Way Forward, 2018, pp. 163-176