Rethinking the employment relationship: a neo-pluralist critique of British industrial relations orthodoxy

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Accepted Manuscript (AM)

Author(s)
Ackers, P
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2014
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Radical pluralism, the mainstream perspective for British and European industrial relations, centres on a Marxian, sociological conception of the employment relationship, which structures explanations of power and conflict. This theoretical critique stresses the historical specificity of the experience of work and the explanatory limitations of the employment relationship. The intellectual history of radical pluralism is traced from Fox ((1974), Beyond Contract: Work, Power and Trust Relations, London: Faber) to Edwards ((1995, 2003), 'The Employment Relationship,' in Industrial Relations, ed. P. Edwards, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1-36) and Blyton and Turnbull ((1994, 1998, 2004), The Dynamics of Employee Relations, Basingstoke: Macmillan). Five objections to the radical-pluralist employment relationship are outlined and an alternative, neo-pluralist sociological and historical perspective is sketched.

Journal Title

International Journal of Human Resource Management

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

25

Issue

18

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published in the International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25 (18), pp. 2608-2625, 03 Apr 2012, copyright Taylor & Francis, available online at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.667429

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Marketing

Policy and administration

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Ackers, P, Rethinking the employment relationship: a neo-pluralist critique of British industrial relations orthodoxy, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2014, 25 (18), pp. 2608-2625

Collections