Rewriting Australian Liberalism: The High Court's Jurisprudence of Rights

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Patapan, H
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)

J Dryzek, B Galligan and P Murray

Date
1996
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

The High Court's recent rights jurisprudence has been unusually controversial. This paper argues that it is possible to evaluate the important developments in the Court's jurisprudence by examining the philosophical foundations of its understanding of rights. Relying on the distinction between utilitarian rights and natural and human rights, the paper discerns in the Court's traditional legalism as well as its more recent jurisprudence of implied rights a consistent commitment to a utilitarian conception of rights. In contrast, the paper argues that the Court's human rights jurisprudence represents a fundamental shift in its view of rights and judicial review, with far-reaching consequences for Australian constitutionalism and liberalism.

Journal Title

Australian Journal of Political Science

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

31 2

Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Nutrigenomics and personalised nutrition

Policy and administration

Political science

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections