Why there is a need for an international nomenclature and classification system for suicide (Editorial)

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Silverman, Morton M
De Leo, Diego
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2016
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

The Status Quo: There is no internationally agreed-upon set of terms, definitions, or classifications for the range of thoughts, communications, and behaviors that are related to self-injurious behaviors, with or without the intent to die. Nor is there an agreed taxonomy that encompasses the full spectrum of what are often clinically defined as suicide-related behaviors. The suicide literature remains replete with confusing (and sometimes pejorative) terms, definitions, descriptors, and classifications that make it difficult, if not impossible, to compare and contrast different research studies, clinical reports, or epidemiological surveys, or to make generalizations or extrapolations. The relative rarity of suicide phenomena, especially fatal events, would make particularly desirable the aggregation of data from different research groups. This would allow for performing meta-analytic evaluations and make parsimonious use of the small amount of money dedicated to suicide research worldwide.

Journal Title

Crisis

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

37

Issue

2

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Communication and media studies

Science & Technology

Social Sciences

Life Sciences & Biomedicine

Psychiatry

Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Silverman, MM; De Leo, D, Why there is a need for an international nomenclature and classification system for suicide (Editorial), Crisis, 2016, 37 (2), pp. 83-87

Collections