Evidence-based practice in use of CTOs: Authors' reply (Letter)
File version
Author(s)
Kisely, Steve
Rugkasa, Jorun
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
Drs Karagianis, Hastings, and Gray disagree with our assessment of the evidence on the effectiveness of community treatment orders (CTOs). In our reviews of studies from Canada and abroad, we apply recognised principles of evidence-based medicine (EBM) to assess the quality of the research. We found some studies show therapeutic benefits for CTOs. These include studies commissioned by governments, often conducted by nonacademic consultancies and not subject to peer review, and a number of small-scale, uncontrolled studies. These are the kinds of studies conducted in Canada. They do not provide robust evidence for efficacy of CTOs, especially when few high-quality studies report positive outcomes, and all the randomized studies and the best nonrandomized ones find no evidence of therapeutic benefit.
Journal Title
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
61
Issue
7
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Psychology
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Psychiatry
COMMUNITY TREATMENT ORDERS
OCTET
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Dawson, J; Kisely, S; Rugkasa, J, Evidence-based practice in use of CTOs: Authors' reply (Letter), The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 2016, 61 (7), pp. 437-438