Evidence-based practice in use of CTOs: Authors' reply (Letter)

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Dawson, John
Kisely, Steve
Rugkasa, Jorun
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2016
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Drs Karagianis, Hastings, and Gray disagree with our assessment of the evidence on the effectiveness of community treatment orders (CTOs). In our reviews of studies from Canada and abroad, we apply recognised principles of evidence-based medicine (EBM) to assess the quality of the research. We found some studies show therapeutic benefits for CTOs. These include studies commissioned by governments, often conducted by nonacademic consultancies and not subject to peer review, and a number of small-scale, uncontrolled studies. These are the kinds of studies conducted in Canada. They do not provide robust evidence for efficacy of CTOs, especially when few high-quality studies report positive outcomes, and all the randomized studies and the best nonrandomized ones find no evidence of therapeutic benefit.

Journal Title

The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

61

Issue

7

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Biomedical and clinical sciences

Psychology

Science & Technology

Life Sciences & Biomedicine

Psychiatry

COMMUNITY TREATMENT ORDERS

OCTET

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Dawson, J; Kisely, S; Rugkasa, J, Evidence-based practice in use of CTOs: Authors' reply (Letter), The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 2016, 61 (7), pp. 437-438

Collections