Towards development of guidelines for harnessing implementation science for suicide prevention: an international Delphi expert consensus study

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Version of Record (VoR)

Author(s)
Krishnamoorthy, Sadhvi
Armstrong, Gregory
Ross, Victoria
Reifels, Lennart
Purdon, Hayley
Francis, Jillian
Hawgood, Jacinta
Mathieu, Sharna
Kasal, Alexandr
Crawford, Allison
Gustavson, Allison M
Székely, András
Baran, Anna
Erlangsen, Annette
Nemiro, Ashley
et al.
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2025
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract

Objectives Suicide research and prevention are complex. Many practical, methodological and ethical challenges must be overcome to implement effective suicide prevention interventions. Implementation science can offer insights into what works, why and in what context. Yet, there are limited real-world examples of the application of implementation science in suicide prevention. This study aimed to identify approaches to employ principles of implementation science to tackle important challenges in suicide prevention.

Methods A questionnaire about promoting implementation science for suicide prevention was developed through thematic analysis of stakeholder narratives. Statements were categorised into six domains: research priorities, practical considerations, approach to intervention design and delivery, lived experience engagement, dissemination and the way forward. The questionnaire (n=52 statements—round 1; n=44 statements—round 2; n=9 statements—round 3) was administered electronically to a panel (n=62—round 1, n=48—round 2; n=45—round 3) of international experts (suicide researchers, leaders, project team members, lived experience advocates). Statements were rated on a Likert scale based on an understanding of importance and priority of each item. Statements endorsed by at least 85% of the panel would be included in the final guidelines.

Results Eighty-two of the 90 statements were endorsed. Recommendations included broadening research inquiries to understand overall programme impact; accounting for resources in the translation of evidence into practice; embedding implementation science in intervention delivery and design; meaningfully engaging lived experience; considering channels for dissemination of implementation-related findings and focusing on next steps needed to routinely harness the strengths of implementation science in suicide prevention research, practice and training.

Conclusion An interdisciplinary panel of suicide prevention experts reached a consensus on optimal strategies for using implementation science to enhance the effectiveness of policies and programmes aimed at reducing suicide.

Journal Title

BMJ Public Health

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

3

Issue

1

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. Published by BMJ Group.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Public health

Social psychology

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Krishnamoorthy, S; Armstrong, G; Ross, V; Reifels, L; Purdon, H; Francis, J; Hawgood, J; Mathieu, S; Kasal, A; Crawford, A; Gustavson, AM; Székely, A; Baran, A; Erlangsen, A; Nemiro, A; et al., Towards development of guidelines for harnessing implementation science for suicide prevention: an international Delphi expert consensus study, BMJ Public Health, 2025, 3 (1), pp. e001206

Collections