Correction to the FIELD study report

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Keech, Anthony
Simes, John
Barter, Philip
Best, James
Scott, Russell
Taskinen, Marja-Riitta
Hamilton-Craig, Ian
et al.
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2006
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

In undertaking further analyses of the FIELD study,1 we recently detected that the reported effects of fenofibrate adjusted for on-study use of other lipid-lowering therapy are not time-dependent as was stated. The aim of the analysis was to account for the higher rate of use of other lipid-lowering therapy (mostly statins) during the study in the placebo group (average 17%) than in the fenofibrate group (average 8%). A programming mis-specification meant that this secondary analysis used drop-in to other lipid-lowering therapy as a fixed, rather than as a time-dependent, covariate in the Cox regression model.

The net effect is that, for patients who started lipid-lowering treatment during the trial without a prior on-study event, all their trial experience from the date of randomisation was grouped separately in the analysis for the comparisons of fenofibrate versus placebo (fixed covariate model). In this sense, subsequent lipid-lowering therapy was modelled like a baseline covariate. By contrast, the time-dependent model groups only the patients' experience after drop-in separately in the analysis.

Journal Title

The Lancet

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

368

Issue

9545

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Medical and Health Sciences

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections