Reply to 'Policy institutions and forest carbon'

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Macintosh, Andrew
Keith, Heather
Lindenmayer, David
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2016
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Cowie et al. make a number of claims about our analysis, all of which we believe to be misguided. For example, they claim our 'basic scenarios' excluded “those parts of the life cycle that occur abroad,” even though our article explicitly states otherwise. They also claim it is unclear whether we applied an attributional or consequential approach to life-cycle assessment (LCA), despite the opening paragraph clearly stating that the article is concerned with consequential LCA (CLCA).

Journal Title

Nature Climate Change

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

6

Issue

9

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Persistent link to this record
Citation

Macintosh, A; Keith, H; Lindenmayer, D, Reply to 'Policy institutions and forest carbon', Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6 (9), pp. 805-806

Collections