Triage tools to inform the prioritisation of physical health services following a diagnosis of cancer: a scoping review
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Capozzi, Lauren C
Linton, Corey
Wright, Adrian
Jones, Tamara
Wright, Hattie H
Bolam, Kate A
Johnston, Elizabeth A
Clifford, Briana K
Bean, Keegan
Brown, Stephanie
Kolesaric, Sarah
Kennedy, Mary A
Chan, Bryan A
Rose, Grace L
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract
Purpose Many people face multiple cancer- and treatment-related sequalae. Triage and referral to physical health services can manage such consequences, but a comprehensive understanding of available triage tools is lacking. This review (i) identifies tools used to triage to physical health services, (ii) maps tool characteristics and application outcomes and (iii) summarises existing gaps.
Methods A systematic search was conducted (three databases, April 2024). Articles were included if they used a tool to triage to physical health services. Tools were classified by triaged disciplines (i.e., diet, exercise, physical rehabilitation, multidisciplinary) and screened physical impairments (e.g., malnutrition). Tool characteristics (e.g., triage method) and application outcomes (i.e., reach, triage rates) were extracted.
Results Of 23,369 records retrieved, 67 studies were included. Studies comprised 78 instances of tool use (64 unique tools), where n = 33 triaged to dietetics (42%), n = 6 exercise (8%), n = 11 physical rehabilitation (14%), and n = 28 a combination of health disciplines (36%). Mean age was 65 years. Most tools were used during-treatment (45%), in hospital settings (62%), measured malnutrition/physical function (60%) and used single cut-off scores (68%). Reach and triage rates varied, with exercise (reach = 89%) and diet (triage = 63%) rates highest.
Conclusion Many physical health triage tools exist, most solely for dietetics, with heterogeneous characteristics and application outcomes. Updated tools are needed for triage to exercise/physical rehabilitation, multiple age cohorts across the cancer continuum, and that potentially use multiple cut-off scores. Cancer care professionals can use this compendium to identify which tool characteristics best suit their healthcare setting, for optimal outcomes.
Journal Title
Supportive Care in Cancer
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
33
Issue
9
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© The Author(s) 2025. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Persistent link to this record
Citation
White, GL; Capozzi, LC; Linton, C; Wright, A; Jones, T; Wright, HH; Bolam, KA; Johnston, EA; Clifford, BK; Bean, K; Brown, S; Kolesaric, S; Kennedy, MA; Chan, BA; Rose, GL, Triage tools to inform the prioritisation of physical health services following a diagnosis of cancer: a scoping review, Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025, 33 (9), pp. 760