Ten steps for specifying saturation in qualitative research

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Files
Buckley2838290-Accepted.pdf
Embargoed until 2025-07-19
File version

Accepted Manuscript (AM)

Author(s)
Buckley, Ralf
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2022
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract

Saturation is critical to reliability of qualitative social sciences, but methods descriptions differ greatly in the degree of detail provided. Rigour could be improved by routinely following a ten-step methodological protocol. 1. Define the underlying disciplinary framework. 2. Specify the target class precisely. 3. Show how participants or cases were selected or excluded. 4. Describe techniques to minimise inadvertent or indirect selection bias. 5. Report homogeneity or heterogeneity of cases, relative to the focus of analysis. 6. Report processes for elicitation or extraction of information content. 7. Select code, meaning or model saturation. 8. Specify code and concept fineness or granularity. 9. Report order and randomisation of cases. 10. Define the level of precision in post facto tests of saturation.

Journal Title

Social Science & Medicine

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2022 Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, providing that the work is properly cited.

Item Access Status
Note

This publication has been entered in Griffith Research Online as an advanced online version.

Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Sociology

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Buckley, R, Ten steps for specifying saturation in qualitative research, Social Science & Medicine, 2022, pp. 115217

Collections