Measuring net-positive outcomes for nature using accounting

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Files

Keith433483-Accepted.pdf (292.83 KB)

File version

Accepted Manuscript (AM)

Author(s)
Burnett, Peter
Vardon, Michael
Keith, Heather
King, Steven
Lindenmayer, David
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2020
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

In their recent commentary on international policy on nature conservation, Bull et al.1 make a timely argument that if biodiversity is to be conserved (a proposition for which there is overwhelming support), policy must shift from a focus on avoiding losses towards one that focuses on net outcomes, or more specifically on targeting netpositive outcomes. Under such an approach, losses and gains would be quantified in ‘an integrated framework that permits transparency as to whether biodiversity goals are being achieved’. We argue that such an integrated framework already exists in the form of the United Nations System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA)2 . The challenge is to incorporate biodiversity accounting in international policy, such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), and make it operational.

Journal Title

Nature Ecology & Evolution

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

4

Issue

3

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2020 Springer Nature Publishing AG. This is an electronic version of an article published in Nature ecology & evolution, 4 (3), pp. 284-285. Nature ecology & evolution is available online at: http://link.springer.com/ with the open URL of your article.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Environmental sciences

Science & Technology

Life Sciences & Biomedicine

Ecology

Evolutionary Biology

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Burnett, P; Vardon, M; Keith, H; King, S; Lindenmayer, D, Measuring net-positive outcomes for nature using accounting, Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2020, 4 (3), pp. 284-285

Collections