How the statutory health attorney provision in Mental Health Act 2016 (Qld) is incompatible with human rights
File version
Author(s)
Turner, Kathryn
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Mental Health Act 2016 (Qld) (MHA 2016) includes many 'less restrictive ways' to minimise involuntary/compulsory treatment. One such measure, the statutory health attorney, has been adopted from the Powers of Attorney Act 1998 (Qld). This paper analyses the statutory health attorney provision against the human rights framework adopted by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). METHOD: The statutory health attorney provision was analysed against the CRPD article 12 (equal recognition before the law). RESULTS: The statutory health attorney provision is not based on the will and preferences of the individual, is not free from conflict of interest and is not subject to the required safeguards. CONCLUSION: The use of a statutory health attorney brings mental health and physical health under the same provision (the fusion law/proposal). However, the statutory health attorney provision is not compatible with the contemporary human rights framework adopted by the CRPD.
Journal Title
Australas Psychiatry
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
This publication has been entered as an advanced online version in Griffith Research Online.
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Psychology
human rights
medical/psychiatric ethics
mental health law
substitute decision-making
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Gill, NS; Turner, K, How the statutory health attorney provision in Mental Health Act 2016 (Qld) is incompatible with human rights., Australas Psychiatry, 2020, pp. 1039856220968406-