Representing Whose Access and Allocation Interests? Stakeholder Perceptions and Interests Representation in Climate Governance
File version
Accepted Manuscript (AM)
Author(s)
Maraseni, Tek
Breakey, Hugh
Ma, Hwan-ok
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Edmondson, B
Levy, S
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
This chapter presents findings from quantitative and qualitative investigations of the perspectives of participants involved in international climate governance over the period 2010–2015. An established framework of principles, criteria and indicators for institutional governance was applied to two mechanisms under the UNFCCC: the initiative referred to as ‘Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests, and enhancement of forest stocks in developing countries’ (REDD+) and the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) of the Kyoto Protocol. Assessment focuses on the governance value of interest representation in terms of inclusiveness (access) and resources (allocation).
Journal Title
Conference Title
Book Title
Transformative Climates and Accountable Governance
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2019 Springer. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. It is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the publisher’s website for further information.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Political science
Environmental management
Applied ethics
Science & Technology
Social Sciences
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Green & Sustainable Science & Technology
Environmental Studies
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Cadman, T; Maraseni, T; Breakey, H; Ma, H-O, Representing Whose Access and Allocation Interests? Stakeholder Perceptions and Interests Representation in Climate Governance, Transformative Climates and Accountable Governance, 2019, pp. 223-249