Protocols for Protection of human Participants: A Comparison of Five Countries
File version
Author(s)
Campbell, Megan M
Aliyeva, Turana A
Mateo, Nino Jose
Zarean, Mostafa
O'Donovan, Analise
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
1288731 bytes
File type(s)
application/pdf
Location
License
Abstract
Research ethics protocols relating to human participants were compared across five countries, namely, Australia, Azerbaijan, Iran, the Philippines, and South Africa. These countries were considered to be geographically and culturally diverse, as well as representing both developed and developing countries. The extent to which the research participant is protected across cultures and countries was investigated, with particular focus on the use of informed consent procedures. It was argued that current ethical guidelines and practices fail to ensure the protection of the most vulnerable participants within these cultures. Informed consent mechanisms also often fail to consider cultural differences in self-concept, understanding of research methods, and power differences between researchers and participants. Discussion of these ethical challenges and recommendations for research ethics development within these cultures and countries are discussed.
Journal Title
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
8
Issue
3
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Published as citation above. Copyright 2013 by the Regents of the University of California. Copying and permissions notice: Authorization to copy this content beyond fair use (as specified in Sections 107 and 108 of the U. S. Copyright Law) for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by the Regents of the University of California for libraries and other users, provided that they are registered with and pay the specified fee via Rightslinkcopyright on [Caliber (http://caliber.ucpress.net/)/ AnthroSource (http://www.anthrosource.net)] or directly with the Copyright Clearance Center, http://www.copyright.com
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Other psychology
Applied ethics