The effect of perturbation onset timing and length on tripping recovery strategies
File version
Author(s)
Simon, Ann M
Rouse, Elliott J
Kuiken, Todd A
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
Boston, MA, USA
License
Abstract
In control subjects, trips during the early and late swing phase of walking elicit elevating and lowering strategies, respectively. However, the transition between these recovery strategies during mid-swing is unclear. A better understanding of this transition would provide insight into what factors cause individuals to choose one strategy over another. Three control subjects walked on a treadmill while attached to a custom-made tripping device. Perturbations of various lengths (ranging from 50 ms to 350 ms) were applied throughout the swing phase of gait. The results suggest that as perturbation length increased, the transition from elevating to lowering strategies occurred at earlier perturbation onsets. The transition period varied linearly with perturbation length. Perturbation lengths of 150 ms to 250 ms more closely replicated strategy selection in trips induced by real obstacles. Perturbations that are longer in duration force the transition from an elevating to a lowering strategy to occur at an earlier percentage of swing. These results show that perturbation length affects recovery strategy selection in response to trips. © 2011 IEEE.
Journal Title
Conference Title
2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Science & Technology
Engineering, Biomedical
Engineering, Electrical & Electronic
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Shirota, C; Simon, AM; Rouse, EJ; Kuiken, TA, The effect of perturbation onset timing and length on tripping recovery strategies, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2011, pp. 7833-7836