Compulsory Income Management under the Stronger Futures Laws - Providing 'Flexibility' or Overturning Freedom of Contract?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Version of Record (VoR)

Author(s)
Bielefeld, Shelley
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2013
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

This article argues that whilst income management has been heralded by the Government as providing ‘greater choice and flexibility’ for welfare recipients,1 the scheme significantly erodes freedom of contract for those subject to it. The doctrine of freedom of contract maintains that consumers are to have freedom to enter into contracts for goods and services of their own choice with merchants of their own choice.

Journal Title

Indigenous Law Bulletin

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

8

Issue

5

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2013 Indigenous Law Centre and the author(s). The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. For information about this journal please refer to the journal’s website or contact the author(s).

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Law and Society

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Policy

Policy and Administration

Law

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections