Practices and Models: Prospects for Commodity-Based SWFs
File version
Author(s)
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
In the past two decades or so, over 50 resource-rich countries have set up investment funds to store a portion of their revenues from oil, gas, or other mineral production and exports. They include the world’s very rich and the very poor countries, and democratic and autocratic regimes. Some resource funds have been successful in expanding national wealth, helping smooth out national business cycles and supplanting national incomes; others are less so; and a few simply squandered national wealth. Setting up a resource fund is not panacea to the social, economic, and political problems a country faces, nor is there one model all resource funds can follow in their governance and in their operation. This chapter draws some comparative lessons on why and how government justified to the public assigning a portion of revenue from producing and exporting natural sources to a separate account as an investment fund, the optimal governance structures to ensure the wealth is managed for the interest of the people, and investment strategies for the funds’ sustainability and expansion. A clearly defined legal framework, transparent governance structure, and rules-based investments are all helpful, but they do not determine the success or failure of NRFs. Understanding how domestic politics plays out at each stage of the fund’s development is what this chapter seeks to achieve.
Journal Title
Conference Title
Book Title
The Political Economy of Natural Resource Funds
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Political economy and social change
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Yi-chong, X, Practices and Models: Prospects for Commodity-Based SWFs, The Political Economy of Natural Resource Funds, 2021, pp. 261-286