Corporate social responsibility leadership for sustainable development: An institutional logics perspective in Brazil

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Pureza, Alvaro Plinio
Lee, Ki-Hoon
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2020
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

This study investigates what drives the implementation of corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices in Brazil. It combines multiaspects of institutional forces and a multilevel analysis into one study to identify patterns of behaviour and leadership rationale. We use interviews to collect data from 16 top Brazilian corporations with good CSR reputations. Building on the institutional logics perspective, the study differentiates four CSR patterns of behaviour and identifies two leadership rationales behind those patterns: the reactionary and reputational self-oriented rationale and the responsible and collaborative system-oriented rationale. The “self-oriented” rationale is linked to leaderships with predominantly egotistic values and short-term thinking characteristics. Conversely, the “system-oriented” rationale is linked to leaderships with predominantly altruistic values and long-term thinking characteristics. These findings provide new insights into the sustainable development debate and help practitioners evaluate the appropriateness of their own CSR practices for the company's strategy and leadership rationale.

Journal Title

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

27

Issue

3

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Strategy, management and organisational behaviour

Development studies

Policy and administration

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Pureza, AP; Lee, KH, Corporate social responsibility leadership for sustainable development: An institutional logics perspective in Brazil, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2020, 27 (3), pp. 1410-1424

Collections