A systematic review of the diagnostic stability of Autism Spectrum Disorder
File version
Author(s)
Sarkozy, Vanessa
Ridley, Greta
Williams, Katrina
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
There is debate in the current literature regarding the permanence of an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) diagnosis. We undertook a systematic review of the diagnostic stability of ASD to summarise current evidence. A comprehensive search strategy was used to identify studies. Participants were children with ASD. Risk of bias was assessed by examining the sample selected, recruitment method, completeness of follow up, timing of diagnosis and blinding. Twenty three studies assessed diagnostic stability with a total of 1466 participants. Fifty three to100% of children still had a diagnosis of Autistic Disorder (AD) and 14-100% of children still had a diagnosis of another form of ASD at follow up. There is some evidence that Autistic Disorder is a reasonably stable diagnosis; however a significant minority of children will no longer meet diagnostic criteria after a period of follow up, particularly those diagnosed in the preschool years with cognitive impairment. Other Autism Spectrum Disorders have very variable stability between studies and clinicians when using this diagnosis need inform parents of its instability. This study supports the stricter diagnostic criteria in DSM-V. There is a need for long term, large population cohort studies measuring diagnostic stability.
Journal Title
Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
6
Issue
1
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Specialist Studies in Education not elsewhere classified
Specialist Studies in Education
Psychology