This submission examines and compares different approaches to preparing and performing a specific programme of Western concert clarinet repertoire. Historic and modern sources concerning contrasting performance approaches are used to inform preparation, performance, and evaluation of multiple concerts of identical repertoire yet differing approach. The paper reflects on the implications of these approaches on the performer, clarinet technique, musical outcomes, and interactions with other parties. An introductory chapter provides insight into the background of the researcher, details the research process, and compares the project to existing literature. Following this introduction is an autoethnographic narrative which details the data-gathering stage of the project. This leads into a discussion of the implications of the project and recommendations for future research. The submission consists of this paper and the accompanying three audio-visual recordings. Those who will benefit most from this study include music teachers, students, and performers who hope to develop awareness of the range of interpretive options available when approaching repertoire of this kind. While clarinet repertoire formed the basis of the action research portion of the study the issues the project deals with, and its conclusions, have application for the wider musical community.