Academics: How Career Structures and Segmentation Undermine Pay Regulation

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Strachan, G
Peetz, D
Broadbent, K
Bailey, J
Whitehouse, G
Troup, C
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)

David Peetz, Georgina Murray

Date
2017
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Women academics experience low regulation distance due to collective agreements, state regulation, unionization, and formalized policies. Using a large Australian survey, we find that the occupation is, overall, of mixed gender, but labor segmentation occurs within academia, as there are several labor markets related to academic disciplines. Internal pay gaps are minimized by rules on formal pay, but universities seek “flexibility” through discretionary bonuses. The immediate driver of the gender gap is uneven proportions of women at different levels of academia. Non-pay elements entrench gender-related barriers to advancement, including harassment, issues of insecurity associated with casual and fixed-term work, marginalization of new entrants into teaching-heavy roles, and the impact that norms about care responsibilities have on the domestic–work interface and on women’s access to social capital.

Journal Title
Conference Title
Book Title

Women, Labor Segmentation and Regulation: Varieties of Gender Gaps

Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Human resources management

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections