Pooled analysis of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist use and mortality after emergency laparotomy

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Thomas, Hannah S
Weiser, Thomas G
Drake, Thomas M
Knight, Stephen R
Fairfield, Cameron
Ademuyiwa, Adesoji O
Aguilera, Maria Lorena
Alexander, Philip
Al-Saqqa, Sara W
Borda-Luque, Giuliano
Costas-Chavarri, Ainhoa
Ntirenganya, Faustin
Fitzgerald, J Edward
Arthur, Tom
Et al.
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2019
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist has fostered safe practice for 10 years, yet its place in emergency surgery has not been assessed on a global scale. The aim of this study was to evaluate reported checklist use in emergency settings and examine the relationship with perioperative mortality in patients who had emergency laparotomy. Methods: In two multinational cohort studies, adults undergoing emergency laparotomy were compared with those having elective gastrointestinal surgery. Relationships between reported checklist use and mortality were determined using multivariable logistic regression and bootstrapped simulation. Results: Of 12 296 patients included from 76 countries, 4843 underwent emergency laparotomy. After adjusting for patient and disease factors, checklist use before emergency laparotomy was more common in countries with a high Human Development Index (HDI) (2455 of 2741, 89⋅6 per cent) compared with that in countries with a middle (753 of 1242, 60⋅6 per cent; odds ratio (OR) 0⋅17, 95 per cent c.i. 0⋅14 to 0⋅21, P < 0⋅001) or low (363 of 860, 42⋅2 percent; OR 0⋅08, 0⋅07 to 0⋅10, P < 0⋅001) HDI. Checklist use was less common in elective surgery than for emergency laparotomy in high-HDI countries (risk difference −9⋅4 (95 per cent c.i. −11⋅9 to −6⋅9) per cent; P < 0⋅001), but the relationship was reversed in low-HDI countries (+12⋅1 (+7⋅0 to +17⋅3) per cent; P < 0⋅001). In multivariable models, checklist use was associated with a lower 30-day perioperative mortality (OR 0⋅60, 0⋅50 to 0⋅73; P < 0⋅001). The greatest absolute benefit was seen for emergency surgery in low-and middle-HDI countries. Conclusion: Checklist use in emergency laparotomy was associated with a significantly lower perioperative mortality rate. Checklist use in low-HDI countries was half that in high-HDI countries.

Journal Title
British Journal of Surgery
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
106
Issue
2
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2019 The Authors. BJS published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Surgery
IMPLEMENTATION
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Thomas, Et al., Pooled analysis of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist use and mortality after emergency laparotomy, British Journal of Surgery, 2019, 106 (2), pp. E103-E112
Collections