Differences in forest plant functional trait distributions across land use and productivity gradients

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Mayfield, Margaret M
Dwyer, John M
Chalmandrier, Loic
Wells, Jessie A
Bonser, Stephen P
Catterall, Carla P
DeClerck, Fabrice
Ding, Yi
Fraterrigo, Jennifer M
Metcalfe, Daniel J
Queiroz, Cibele
Vesk, Peter A
Morgan, John W
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2013
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

• Premise of study: Plant functional traits are commonly used as proxies for plant responses to environmental challenges, yet few studies have explored how functional trait distributions differ across gradients of land‐use change. By comparing trait distributions in intact forests with those across land‐use change gradients, we can improve our understanding of the ways land‐use change alters the diversity and functioning of plant communities.

• Methods: We examined how the variation and distribution of trait values for seven plant functional traits differ between reference natural forest and three types of land‐use conversion (pasture, old‐field, or “legacy” sites—regrowth following logging), landscape productivity (NPP) and vegetation strata (tree or non‐tree “understory”), in a meta‐analysis of studies from 15 landscapes across five continents.

• Key results: Although trait variation often differed between land‐uses within a landscape, these patterns were rarely consistent across landscapes. The variance and distribution of traits were more likely to differ consistently between natural forest and land‐use conversion categories for understory (non‐tree) plants than for trees. Landscape productivity did not significantly alter the difference in trait variance between natural forest and land‐use conversion categories for any trait except dispersal.

• Conclusions: Our results suggest that even for traits well linked to plant environmental response strategies, broad classes of land‐use change and landscape productivity are not generally useful indicators of the mechanisms driving compositional changes in human‐modified forest systems.

Journal Title
American Journal of Botany
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
100
Issue
7
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Conservation and biodiversity
Ecology
Evolutionary biology
Plant biology
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections