Are laboratory growth rate experiments relevant to explaining bloom-forming cyanobacteria distributions at global scale?
File version
Author(s)
Hamilton, DP
O'Brien, KR
Adams, MP
Willis, A
Burford, MA
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
Predicting algal population dynamics using models informed by experimental data has been used as a strategy to inform the management and control of harmful cyanobacterial blooms. We selected toxic bloom-forming species Microcystis spp. and Raphidiopsis raciborskii (basionym Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii) for further examination as they dominate in 78 % and 17 %, respectively, of freshwater cyanobacterial blooms (cyanoHABs) reported globally over the past 30 years. Field measurements of cyanoHABs are typically based on biomass accumulation, but laboratory experiments typically measure growth rates, which are an important variable in cyanoHAB models. Our objective was to determine the usefulness of laboratory studies of these cyanoHAB growth rates for simulating the species dominance at a global scale. We synthesized growth responses of M. aeruginosa and R. raciborskii from 20 and 16 culture studies, respectively, to predict growth rates as a function of two environmental variables, light and temperature. Predicted growth rates of R. raciborskii exceeded those of M. aeruginosa at temperatures
Journal Title
Harmful Algae
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
92
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Freshwater ecology
Plant physiology
Bacteriology
Biological sciences
Environmental sciences
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Xiao, M; Hamilton, DP; O'Brien, KR; Adams, MP; Willis, A; Burford, MA, Are laboratory growth rate experiments relevant to explaining bloom-forming cyanobacteria distributions at global scale?, Harmful Algae, 2020, 92, pp. 101732: 1-101732: 10