India, the Rome Statute, and the International Criminal Court: Negotiating to No

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version
Author(s)
Hall, Christopher
Jeffery, Renee
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2020
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

In October 2015 the President of Sudan, Omar Hassan Al Bashir, attended the third India-Africa Forum summit in New Delhi. With two warrants for his arrest outstanding, he was a wanted man.1 The first sitting head of state to be indicted by the International Criminal Court (ICC), he had earlier been charged with two counts of war crimes, three of genocide and five of crimes against humanity. 2 United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 1593 (2005), which first referred the situation in Darfur to the ICC, had “urge[d] all States and concerned regional and other international organizations to cooperate fully” with the Court’s activities, regardless of whether they were parties to the Rome Statute. 3 On the eve of Al Bashir’s visit to New Delhi, the ICC Prosecutor reiterated this plea, calling for India to “contribute to the important goal of ending impunity for the world’s worst crimes” by arresting Al Bashir. 4 India neglected, however, to comply.

Journal Title

Global Governance

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

Self-archiving of the author-manuscript version is not yet supported by this journal. Please refer to the journal link for access to the definitive, published version or contact the author[s] for more information.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

International relations

Political science

Policy and administration

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Hall, C; Jeffery, R, India, the Rome Statute, and the International Criminal Court: Negotiating to No, Global Governance, 2020

Collections